How it WorksCase StudiesCustomer Results

A longer heading to establish major facets of the product.

An optional subheading to provide additional context.
See all
MRO/STO
Engg/PD
Construction/Infra
Other
US Airforce, Ogden Air Logistics Center 572nd AMXG, C130 Production Line
MRO/STO
Project
Aircraft Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul
Before
  • Turnaround time 240 days.
  • 13 aircraft in repair cycle.
After
  • Turnaround time 160 days.
  • 7 aircraft in repair cycle.
  • 75% fewer defects.
Boeing Space & Intelligence Systems
Engg/PD
Project
Satellite Design and Assembly
Before
  • Reflectors were the constraint in Antenna and Satellite delivery.
  • Electronic units were late, delaying Satellite subsystems.
  • Classified Government program was behind schedule and losing money.
  • Operation was losing $200M a quarter.
After
  • Doubled Reflectors throughput and reduced cycle time by 28%, alleviating delivery constraint.
  • Increased productivity in Antenna Assembly and Test by 64% and subsequently another 26%.
  • Reduced cycle time for Electronic units, allowing subsystems to finish 30% faster.

US Department of Defense Procurement Organization
Other
Project
Processing of Purchase Requests
Before
  • Long delays in processing requests.
  • Long cycle times.
After
  • Delays reduced by 40%.
  • 76% reduction in cycle time.
  • 29% increase in throughput.
TAP Portugal
MRO/STO
Project
Aircraft Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul
Before
  • Completed a C-check in 16 days on average.
After
  • Completed a C-check in 12 days on average.
  • Freed up capacity to save$260,000 in outsourcing costs.
ABB Halle
MRO/STO
Project
Transformer Repair and Overhaul
Before
  • 42 projects completed.
  • On-time delivery was 68%.
After
  • 54 projects completed in the following year.
  • On-time delivery improved to 83%.
Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories
Engg/PD
Project
Pharmaceutical New Product Development
Before
  • 6 projects completed.20% projects on time in 12 weeks.
  • 85 global generics and PSAI filings.
  • 85 product launches.915 days cycle time for full development.
After
  • 11 projects completed (83% increase).
  • 80% projects on time (60% increase).
  • 110 filings in the following year (30% increase).
  • 149 launches in the following year (75% increase).
  • 563 days cycle time for development in the following year (40% faster).
Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.
Engg/PD
Project
New Product Development For Home Appliances
Before
  • 34 new products per year.
  • 74% projects on time.
After
  • Increased throughput to 52 new products in the 1st year, and to 70+ in the 2nd year, with no increase in headcount.
  • 88% projects on time.
Delta Airlines, Inc.
MRO/STO
Project
Aircraft Engine Repair and Overhaul
Before
  • 476 engines produced per year.
  • 4-8 weeks piece-part cycle time.
  • 60 days landing gear turnaround time.
After
  • 586 engines produced per year (23% increase).
  • 30% reduction in engine turnaround time.
  • 15 days piece-part cycle time (70% reduction).
  • 25% increase in throughput.
  • 30 days landing gear turnaround time (50% reduction).
  • $60M monetized in assets from reduced turnaround time.
  • Ongoing improvement:10 days piece-part turnaround time (30% further reduction).
Tata Steel
MRO/STO
Project
Plant Maintenance and Upgrade
Before
  • 300-500 days for boiler conversion.
  • Routine maintenance took too long.
  • 11 days planned for shutdown.
  • $2M revenue generated per day.
After
  • 120-160 days completion time(68% faster).
  • 8.8 days shutdown achieved.
  • $4M revenue gained.
US Airforce, Warner Robins Air Logistics Center C-5 Production Line
MRO/STO
Project
Aircraft Repair and Overhaul
Before
  • Aircraft throughput was 33.36 aircraft on station.
After
  • Aircraft throughput increased to44 in the following year (33% increase).
  • 24 aircraft on station, 12 aircraft returned to Air Force.
Terumo Heart Inc.
Engg/PD
Project
Medical Device Development
Before
  • Laser Cover Welding Qualification project ran for 2 years.
After
  • Similar project ran for only 6 months.
  • 90% on-time delivery (within one week)
Hyatt Hotels
Construction/Infra
Project
New Hotel Projects
Before
  • Execution rate was 40% of plannedrate in the finishing stage.
After
  • Execution rate was doubled through synchronisation between 40 execution contractors, vendors& consultants.
Vardhman Special Steels
Construction/Infra
Project
Hot Strip Mill Expansion Project
Before
  • Industry standard of 12 months fora similar project.
  • 2 Shutdowns planned.
After
  • Project completed 1.5 months ahead of management target.
  • Shutdowns completed on-time with added scope.
Airgo Networks
Engg/PD
Project
Next Generation Wireless Technology Product Development
Before
  • Cycle time from first silicon to production for 1st generation was 19 months.
After
  • Cycle time from first silicon to production for 2nd generation was 8 months.
BHP Billiton
Construction/Infra
Project
Iron Ore Asset Development Projects
Before
  • 25,800 man-hours of engineering design work had to be completed in 8 months.
  • Historical delays of 2 weeks and man-hour overruns of 20%.
After
  • Project finished 3 weeks early.
  • Productivity increased by 25% with only 19,500 man-hours needed.
Emcocables
Construction/Infra
Project
Manufacturing Plant Construction
Before
  • 11 months industry standard project duration.
After
  • 7 months to project completion (55% additional revenue 4 months earlier).
Emesa
Construction/Infra
Project
TGV Station Construction
Before
  • 6 months left to deliver, and project was 5 months late.
After
  • Completed 11 months of work in 6 months.
  • Project on time (€5 M penalty avoided).
Thyssen Krupp
Other
Project
Automotive Assembly Systems
Before
  • 70% of projects were late.
  • High overtime and outsourcing.
After
  • Lateness reduced by 50%.
  • 63% gains in productivity.
  • 15% more projects completed.
Skoda Power
Other
Project
Steam Generators
Before
  • 20 casings per year.
  • 60% on-time delivery.
After
  • 27 casings per year (30% increase).
  • 90% on-time delivery.
  • 20%-30% faster cycle time.
eircom
Other
Project
Telecommunications Network Design & Installation
Before
  • On-time delivery was less than75%.
  • Average cycle time was 70days.
After
  • Increased on-time delivery to over98%.
  • Average cycle time reduced to 30 days.
ABB Cordoba
Other
Project
Power Transformers
Before
  • Engineering cycle time was 8months.
  • On-time delivery was 85%.
After
  • Engineering cycle time reduced to3 months.
  • On-time delivery improved to 95%.
  • 16% increase in manufacturing throughput (revenues).
Airbus Defence and Space
Other
Project
Engineering and Manufacturing Payloads for Telecommunication Satellites
Before
  • 24 installation drawings per week in design office.
  • 41% engineering cost overrun in customisation of new payloads.
After
  • 32 installation drawings per week(33% increase in throughput).
  • 6% engineering cost overrun(85% reduction).
Ismeca Semiconductor
Other
Project
Semiconductor Handling Systems
Before
  • 84 days overall cycle time.
  • 24 days production cycle time.
After
  • 64 days overall cycle time (25%reduction).
  • 10 days production cycle time (60%reduction).
US Navy, Fleet Readiness Center Southeast, F-18
MRO/STO
Project
Aircraft Maintence and Upgrades
Before
  • Produced 6 aircraft a year before implementation.
  • WIP of 36 aircraft on station.
After
  • Increased annual throughput by 81% (from 6 aircraft to 11).                        
  • Reduced WIP from 36 aircraft to 17 aircraft.
  • Grew engineering and support capacity to maintain 30 aircraft per year up from 21.
Amdocs
Engg/PD
Project
Customer Experience Systems Customized SW Development for Telecommunications
Before
  • Market pressure to reduce cost and cycle time.
  • 8 projects in crisis requiring CEO level attention.
After
  • 14% increase in revenue/man-month.
  • 20% reduction in cycle time.
  • 0 projects in crisis in the following year.

What’s a Rich Text element?

The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.

Static and dynamic content editing

A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!

How to customize formatting for each rich text

Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.

What’s a Rich Text element?

The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.

Static and dynamic content editing

A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!

How to customize formatting for each rich text

Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.